The following article is abstracted from The Biblical Chronologist Volume 2, Number 3. In Joshua chapter 6, the Bible records the defeat of the city of Jericho by the children of Israel, led by Joshua. The archaeological remains at Tell-es-Sultan correspond to the biblical Jericho. In fact, Kenyon found no evidence at all of occupation of Jericho ca. The dashed line represents a period when Jericho was merely a campsite, the solid lines indicate an unwalled town, and the rectangles indicate a walled city. C., the traditional biblical date for the destruction of Jericho by Joshua. Clearly the destruction of City IV Jericho and the destruction of Jericho by Joshua cannot be the same event if they are separated by 150 years. He proposed that the termination of City IV Jericho be redated from ca. As is evident from the chart, the radiocarbon measurements strongly support the chronology advanced by Kenyon long before the radiocarbon measurements were made. Traditional biblical chronology places the date of the Conquest of Jericho at a time when there was no city at Jericho. D., has proposed an alternate solution, one that solves these problems and does justice to both biblical and secular scientific evidence.
Traditional biblical chronology places this event ca. This is undisputed by mainstream scholarship, whether conservative or liberal. Clearly traditional biblical chronology is in conflict with the chronology of Jericho held by the consensus of modern archaeologists. In the March/April 1990 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review conservative biblical archaeologist Dr. In fact, as noted in the preceding paragraph, traditional biblical chronology of the Exodus and the Conquest is plagued by such problems. He has shown that the correct biblical chronology date for the Conquest is ca.
John Garstang conducted excavations at Jericho from 1930 to 1936. This worked out well for traditional biblical chronology.
His findings however caused a number of difficulties for Egyptologists.
For even Muslims will acknowledge that a real entity called the people of Israel not only exists, but to them the Land of Israel was given: "O my people [Israel]," reads the Quran, "enter the Holy Land which Allah has assigned to you and do not turn back and become losers" (Sura ).
So the Palestinian reimagining of the Bible is going a step further.
His discussion is superficial, at best, lacking both depth and precision. It is clear that the question is one of chronology. Bruins and van der Plicht did not set out to disprove Wood's thesis. These depict Egypt as a stable, properous nation at the very time the traditional biblical chronology date for the Exodus says Egypt should be a nation devastated by plagues.
He argued that a reanalyis of pottery shards excavated from City IV, stratigraphic considerations, scarab evidence, and a single radiocarbon date all converged "to demonstrate that City IV was destroyed in about 1400 B. Assertions made without data to back them up are unconvincing. Six of these samples were charred cereal grains from the City IV destruction. And the archaeological and historical data from Egypt must also be explained. The foregoing article was abstracted from The Biblical Chronologist Volume 2, Number 3.
If the conquest took place during the XVIIIth dynasty of Egypt, where was the evidence of building in the Delta by the Children of Israel during this era.